Understanding conflicting perspectives in event planning and management using Q method

48Citations
Citations of this article
146Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is a need to better understand the interests of actors in the planning and management of major events. The diversity of actor perspectives about an event creates a wicked problem set that event organisers and public officials find difficult to understand, letalone address. This paper focuses on problem identification as one stage in the event planning and management process. It explores how problem structuring can contribute to more effective planning and management of actors' interests. The value of Q methodology is explored through a case study of the Australian World Rally Championship. Four perspectives are identified in the problem structuring process: the Skeptics, the Materialists, the Middle-grounders and the Supporters. The findings demonstrate that Q methodology is effective in identifying the depth and breadth of different problem perspectives, providing insights into the importance of different perspectives, and can be used reflexively to anticipate and manage potential conflict. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phi, G., Dredge, D., & Whitford, M. (2014). Understanding conflicting perspectives in event planning and management using Q method. Tourism Management, 40, 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.07.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free