A systematic review of treatments for acne scarring. Part 1: Non-energy-based techniques

  • Kravvas G
  • Al-Niaimi F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
152Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

[Formula: see text]Lay summaryAcne is a common condition that can result in permanent scarring. We have performed a comprehensive literature search of the last 10 years in order to determine the efficacy and side effects of commonly used treatments against post-acne scarring. A total of 36 relevant articles were identified on the following interventions: subcision (10), dermabrasion (one), microneedling (eight), dermal fillers (five), and chemical peeling (12). Post acne scarring is a common and challenging condition with no easy and definitive solution. The above interventions have been used with varying degrees of efficacy, each having both pros and cons. All have been deemed to be safe with few and transient adverse reactions. However, further trials with larger number of patients are necessary in order to reach more concrete conclusions regarding their efficacy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kravvas, G., & Al-Niaimi, F. (2017). A systematic review of treatments for acne scarring. Part 1: Non-energy-based techniques. Scars, Burns & Healing, 3, 205951311769531. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513117695312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free