Market Unfreedom

9Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

ABSTRACT: John Tomasi's “market democrat” is right to suppose that Rawlsians have erred in omitting economic liberty from their theories of justice. A Rawlsian ought to include economic liberty as a basic freedom because it facilitates individuals' development and pursuit of their conceptions of the good. However, the most plausible version of economic liberty will require the state to guarantee, if possible, that no one will be driven by economic desperation to engage in immiserating work, which may impair rather than facilitate his or her pursuit of the good. There is reason to worry that contemporary economies such as the United States fall seriously short of that ideal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gowder, P. (2014). Market Unfreedom. Critical Review, 26, 306–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2014.957021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free