Citizen preparedness for disasters: Are current assumptions valid?

33Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

US government programs and communications regarding citizen preparedness for disasters rest on several untested, and therefore unverified, assumptions. We explore the assumptions related to citizen preparedness promotion and argue that in spite of extensive messaging about the importance of citizen preparedness and countless household surveys purporting to track the preparedness activities of individuals and households, the role individual Americans are being asked to play is largely based on conventional wisdom. Recommendations for conceptualizing and measuring citizen preparedness are discussed. ©2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Uscher-Pines, L., Chandra, A., Acosta, J., & Kellermann, A. (2012). Citizen preparedness for disasters: Are current assumptions valid? Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 6(2), 170–173. https://doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2012.23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free