Differences between professionals’ views on patient safety culture in long-term and acute care? A cross-sectional study

5Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to assess how patient safety culture and incident reporting differs across different professional groups and between long-term and acute care. The Hospital Survey On Patient Safety Culture (HSPOSC) questionnaire was used to assess patient safety culture. Data from the organizations’ incident reporting system was also used to determine the number of reported patient safety incidents. Design/methodology/approach: Patient safety culture is part of the organizational culture and is associated for example to rate of pressure ulcers, hospital-acquired infections and falls. Managers in health-care organizations have the important and challenging responsibility of promoting patient safety culture. Managers generally think that patient safety culture is better than it is. Findings: Based on statistical analysis, acute care professionals’ views were significantly positive in 8 out of 12 composites. Managers assessed patient safety culture at a higher level than other professional groups. There were statistically significant differences (p = 0.021) in frequency of events reported between professional groups and between long-term and acute care (p = 0.050). Staff felt they did not get enough feedback about reported incidents. Originality/value: The study reveals differences in safety culture between acute care and long-term care settings, and between professionals and managers. The staff felt that they did not get enough feedback about reported incidents. In the future, education should take these factors into consideration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liukka, M., Hupli, M., & Turunen, H. (2021). Differences between professionals’ views on patient safety culture in long-term and acute care? A cross-sectional study. Leadership in Health Services, 34(4), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-11-2020-0096

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free