The Zimmerman-McLean-Foster hypothesis: 25 Years later

89Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is now 25 years since the publication of the landmark article by Zimmerman, McLean, and Foster, in which they cast doubts on the benefit of enucleation, which was the prevailing management of choroidal melanoma at that time. Over the past 25 years several advances have been made in the management of uveal melanoma. Research in the pathobiology of cancer metastasis in general and uveal melanoma in particular has also provided new insights. In this review, the Zimmerman-McLean-Foster hypothesis is explored in the light of current clinical, epidemiological, statistical, and experimental evidence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, A. D., Rennie, I. G., Kivela, T., Seregard, S., & Grossniklaus, H. (2004, July). The Zimmerman-McLean-Foster hypothesis: 25 Years later. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2003.029058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free