The most responsive foot position for non-invasive detection of isolated unstable syndesmotic injuries – a 3D analysis

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to identify the most responsive foot position for detection of isolated unstable syndesmotic injury. Methods: Fourteen paired human cadaveric lower legs were positioned in a pressure-controlled radiolucent frame and loaded under 700 N. Computed tomography scans were performed in neutral position, 15° internal / external rotation, and 20° dorsal / plantar flexion of the foot before and after cutting all syndesmotic ligaments. For each position, generated 3D models of the intact and injured distal tibiofibular joints were matched and analyzed by calculating three parameters: diastasis, anteroposterior displacement, and shortening of the fibula. Results: Transection of syndesmotic ligaments resulted in significant posterior translation of the fibula (4.34°, SD 1.63°, p < 0.01) compared to uninjured state for external rotation, significant anterior translation (-2.08°, SD 1.65°, p < 0.01) for internal rotation, and significant posterior translation (1.32°, SD 1.16°, p = 0.01) for dorsiflexion. Furthermore, the syndesmotic injury led to significantly increased clear space (0.46 mm, SD 0.46 mm, p = 0.03) in external rotation of the foot. Conclusion: External rotation of the foot under loading seems to be the most responsive position for detection of isolated syndesmotic instability. Under external rotational stress, anteroposterior instability and increased clear space resulting from a complete isolated unstable syndesmotic lesion were most evident.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Souleiman, F., Heilemann, M., Osterhoff, G., Hepp, P., Gueorguiev, B., Richards, R. G., … Hennings, R. (2024). The most responsive foot position for non-invasive detection of isolated unstable syndesmotic injuries – a 3D analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05211-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free