Can the best-alternative justification solve hume's problem? on the limits of a promising approach

14Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a recent Philosophy of Science article, Gerhard Schurz proposes meta-inductivistic prediction strategies as a new approach to Hume's problem. This discussion examines the limitations of Schurz's approach. It can be proved that the meta-inductivistic approach does not work anymore if meta-inductivists have to face an infinite number of alternative predictors. With this limitation it remains doubtful whether the meta-inductivist can provide a full solution to the problem of induction. Copyright 2010 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arnold, E. (2010). Can the best-alternative justification solve hume’s problem? on the limits of a promising approach. Philosophy of Science, 77(4), 584–593. https://doi.org/10.1086/656010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free