Two-level games and market constraints on politics in Europe

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Financial markets understood the Euro crisis as a two-level game. They monitored national politics as a source of both national and European policy. The incentives to conform to the market’s preference were weaker for creditor countries than for debtor countries because debtors were providers of their own macroeconomic policy, but each creditor was one of several contributing to bailouts. Worries about default caused investors to sell the bonds of debtors and thereby constrained debtors by raising interest rates. By contrast, if creditor behaviour reduced the probability of a bailout of debtors, the response again would be to sell assets linked to the debtor. The implication is that market responses to creditor elections should have been larger and more turbulent than reactions to debtor elections. We test this theory by analyzing credit default swaps of eleven countries around fifteen elections and conducting a content analysis of 3,126 reports from Bloomberg terminals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McMenamin, I., Breen, M., & Muñoz-Portillo, J. (2022). Two-level games and market constraints on politics in Europe. International Political Science Review, 43(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120924032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free