A COMMENT ON "LGBTQ WORKPLACE INCLUSION BEFORE AND AFTER OBERGEFELL V. HODGES: ASSOCIATION WITH TOBIN'S Q AND ROA"

  • Darden B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Foster, Manikas, and Preece's "LGBTQ WORKPLACE INCLUSION BEFORE AND AFTER OBERGEFELL V. HODGES: ASSOCIATION WITH TOBIN'S Q AND ROA," addresses LGBTQ+ inclusion following Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court case that legalized marriage equality in the United States. This commentary addresses the findings of the work while also highlighting future research considerations, including employing dynamic capabilities and influential ethical decision-making to shape future research studies. Additionally, this work also addresses how influential decision-making in future works should utilize a multi-level approach to analyze the law's impact on workplace policy and the individuals within the organization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Darden, B. B. (2021). A COMMENT ON “LGBTQ WORKPLACE INCLUSION BEFORE AND AFTER OBERGEFELL V. HODGES: ASSOCIATION WITH TOBIN’S Q AND ROA.” Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.60154/jaepp.2021.v22n3p367

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free