Muscle-fat MRI: 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla versus histology

91Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated muscle/fat fraction (MFF) accuracy and reliability measured with an MR imaging technique at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0T scanner strengths, using biopsy as reference. Methods: MRI was performed on muscle samples from pig and rabbit species (n=8) at 1.5T and 3.0T. A chemical shift based 2-point Dixon method was used, collecting in-phase and out-of-phase data for fat/water of muscle samples. Values were compared with MFFs calculated from histology. Results: No significant difference was found between 1.5T and 3.0T (P values=0.41-0.96), or between histology and imaging (P=0.83) for any muscle tested. Conclusions: Results suggest that a 2-point Dixon fat/water separation MRI technique may provide reliable quantification of MFFs at varying field strengths across different animal species, and consistency was established with biopsy. The results set a foundation for larger scale investigation of quantifying muscle fat in neuromuscular disorders. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, A. C., Parrish, T. B., Abbott, R., Hoggarth, M. A., Mendoza, K., Chen, Y. F., & Elliott, J. M. (2014). Muscle-fat MRI: 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla versus histology. Muscle and Nerve, 50(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24255

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free