Gender dynamics in high school policy debate: propagating gender hierarchies in advocating ‘better’ futures

0Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

High school policy debate is an academically rigourous and highly competitive US activity—elite debaters often go on to top universities and pursue successful careers. Access to the skills that debate teaches is invaluable for high schoolers, but these benefits are not equally accessible to all. As a historically male-dominated activity, the number of male debaters remains disproportionately high and the activity continues to be highly influenced by gender hierarchies. Through semi-structured interviews, this paper addresses the question: what makes high school policy debate a unique educational space for producing gender dynamics, and what are the impacts of those dynamics on debaters that identify as women? Our findings show that debate is a complex and contradictory space. While women in debate are disadvantaged by gender imbalance, implicit activity norms, and instances of objectification and sexual violence, the activity also arms students with tools to disrupt these gender hierarchies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robertson, S., Zuniga, P., Christenson, H., & Young, J. (2022). Gender dynamics in high school policy debate: propagating gender hierarchies in advocating ‘better’ futures. Gender and Education, 34(8), 1025–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2022.2094348

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free