Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking

1Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of topic investigation searches that are requested of information professionals is critical to both meeting requestors’ needs and reflecting their intended methodological approaches. Information professionals’ expertise can be an invaluable resource to guide users through the investigative and publication process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fox, Z. E., Williams, A. M., Blasingame, M. N., Koonce, T. Y., Kusnoor, S. V., Su, J., … Giuse, N. B. (2019, October 1). Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking. Journal of the Medical Library Association. Medical Library Association. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.707

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free