Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Ambulatory and Operating Room Rhinology Practice in the US

11Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus virus has altered all facets of clinical practice in the United States. The goal of this study is to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on rhinologic ambulatory and operative practice. Methods: A 27-item survey to assess these objectives was created and approved by the Division of Rhinology faculty at Rush University Medical Center in April 2020. The survey was then distributed to rhinologists in a web based format via www.surveymonkey.com from April 10 through April 23, 2020. Results: A total of 277 U.S based rhinologists responded to the survey (23.04%). The most common practice types were single specialty private (44.9%) and academic (24.6%). 90.2% practice in a state under a shelter in place order. Comparing pre-COVID baseline to during-COVID, there was statistically significant reduction in the number of patients of seen daily in clinic (p < 0.001). The number of nasal endoscopies in the office and surgical procedures fell dramatically. Overall, 5 respondent rhinologists have been infected with COVID-19 and 27 have been furloughed. Conclusion: COVID-19 has drastically affected rhinologic practice. There is a dramatic reduction of in person care in the office setting and surgical management of sinonasal and skull base disease. Enhanced PPE is being used in only half of potentially aerosolizing procedures which represents an area of further education. Novel approaches such as use of virtual encounters and point of care testing should be considered as options to facilitate care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papagiannopoulos, P., Ganti, A., Kim, Y. J., Raad, R. A., Kuan, E. C., Losavio, P., … Batra, P. S. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Ambulatory and Operating Room Rhinology Practice in the US. American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 35(4), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1945892420961962

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free