RAI1 alternate probe identifies additional breast cancer cases as amplified following equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization testing: Experience from a national reference laboratory

12Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context.-In 2013 the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists updated the HER2 guidelines and changed the equivocal category for HER2 in situ hybridization testing to an average HER2 copy number of 4.0 to 5.9 with a HER2:CEP17 ratio of less than 2.0 and proposed retesting, with an option of using another control probe to avoid false-negative results. RAI1, located at band position 17p11.2, is a popular alternate probe locus for retesting equivocal changes. Objective.-To review experience with the RAI1 alternate probe in HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization equivocal breast cancers. Design.-Primary and metastatic breast cancers with equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization, retested with an alternate (RAI1) probe, were identified. HER2, RAI1, and CEP17 copy numbers, HER2 to control probe ratios, and genetic heterogeneity were recorded. Hematoxylin- eosin-stained slides were reviewed for type and grade of cancer. Results.-Of 876 cases tested with CEP17 as the reference probe, 97 (11.1%) had equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization results. Additional testing with the RAI1 probe classified 39.2% cases (38 of 97) as amplified with a HER2:RAI1 ratio ranging from 2.0 to 3.2 (mean, 2.37); 3.1% (3 of 97) were still unclassifiable because of a deletion of RAI1. Conclusions.-RAI1 identified close to 40% of original HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization equivocal cases as amplified, making these patients eligible for targeted therapies. It is not known whether guidelines for US Food and Drug Administration-approved probes can be extrapolated to alternate probes when an alternate control probe shows losses or gains. Because of the lack of guidelines for reporting HER2 status with alternate probes, laboratories face challenges in interpreting results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hui, L., Geiersbach, K. B., Downs-Kelly, E., & Gulbahce, H. E. (2017). RAI1 alternate probe identifies additional breast cancer cases as amplified following equivocal HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization testing: Experience from a national reference laboratory. In Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Vol. 141, pp. 274–278). College of American Pathologists. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0201-OA

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free