Academic and nonacademic laboratories perform equally on CIQC immunohistochemistry proficiency testing

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To test whether academic centers (ACs) are more successful than nonacademic centers (NACs) in immunohistochemistry (IHC) external quality assessment challenges in the Canadian Immunohistochemistry Quality Control (CIQC) program. Methods: Results of 9 CIQC challenges for breast cancer marker (BM) and various non-breast cancer marker (NBM) tests were examined. Success rates were compared between AC/NAC laboratories and those located in small or large cities. Performance was also correlated with annual IHC case volumes. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in performance in any of the comparisons. However, overall performance on BM was significantly better (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, Z. W., Neufeld, H., Copete, M. A., Garratt, J., Gilks, C. B., & Torlakovic, E. E. (2013). Academic and nonacademic laboratories perform equally on CIQC immunohistochemistry proficiency testing. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 140(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPHBL59MWBVYRD

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free