Relationships between Three Summary Question Types, Reading Comprehension, and Writing Expression for Japanese High School Students

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study explores the relationships between reading a passage and writing a summary. Summary writing has two processes: (1) reading comprehension of texts and (2) writing a summary following the instructions in the question. There are three types of summary questions for Japanese learners: (1) reading an English passage and writing a summary in Japanese (EJ type), (2) reading a Japanese passage and writing a summary in English (JE type), and (3) reading an English passage and writing a summary in English (EE type). This study investigates how these summary question types affect Japanese learners in writing a summary. 51 Japanese high school students participated. First, they all took a common reading comprehension test and were then randomly divided into three groups of 17 students each (Group A, B, and C). Group A, B, C took EJ, JE, and EE type summary questions, respectively. The scoring rate of the common reading comprehension test was 89.69%, indicating all the participants’ reading comprehension was generally good. However, the results of summary questions were different. The scoring rate was 46.47%, 40.00%, and 20.00% for EJ, JE, and EE, respectively. These results revealed there was still a significant gap between reading comprehension and writing a summary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watanabe, A. (2023). Relationships between Three Summary Question Types, Reading Comprehension, and Writing Expression for Japanese High School Students. Journal of Asia TEFL, 20(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2023.20.1.2.14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free