Unemployment Rates Forecasts - Unobserved Component Models Versus SARIMA Models In Central And Eastern European Countries

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper we compare the accuracy of unemployment rates forecasts of eight Central and Eastern European countries. The unobserved component models and seasonal ARIMA models are used within a rolling short-term forecast experiment as an out-of-sample test of forecast accuracy. We find that unemployment rates present clear unconditional asymmetry in three out of eight countries. Half the cases there is no difference between forecasting accuracy of the methods used in the study. In the remaining, a proper specification of seasonal ARIMA model allows to generate better forecasts than from unobserved component models. The forecasting accuracy deteriorates in periods of rapid upward and downward movement and improves in periods of gradual change in the unemployment rates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bȩdowska-Sójka, B. (2017). Unemployment Rates Forecasts - Unobserved Component Models Versus SARIMA Models In Central And Eastern European Countries. Comparative Economic Research, 20(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2017-0014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free