Methodological Diversity in Positive Psychology and the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although psychologists were certainly not the first to study flourishing, virtues, spirituality, and religiousness, one of their key contributions has been to examine these constructs using the scientific method. Complex concepts such as gratitude, humility, spirituality, and religiousness present unique challenges to researchers, requiring them to utilize equal doses of scientific rigor and methodological ingenuity. In this chapter, we describe some of these efforts in both positive psychology and the psychology of religion/spirituality (R/S). Specifically, we provide examples of research using correlational cross-sectional data, longitudinal data, experiments, field research, and qualitative and mixed methods. We then discuss the strengths and weaknesses of using each approach to study positive psychological and religious/spiritual constructs. We note some advances in technology that may open new directions for research, and we discuss future directions for the fields, including issues of research transparency and the need for cross-cultural research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsang, J. A., Al-Kire, R. L., Davis, E. B., Alwood, H. N., & Rowatt, W. C. (2022). Methodological Diversity in Positive Psychology and the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. In Handbook of Positive Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (pp. 113–127). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10274-5_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free