Skip to main content

Who counts? What counts? Place and the limits of perinatal mortality measures

5Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Maternal and neonatal mortality statistics foreground some possible causes of death at the expense of others. Political place (nation, state) and place of birth (hospital, home) are integral to these statistics; respect for women as persons is not. Using case examples from Malawi and the United States, I argue that the focus on place embedded in these indicators can legitimate coercive approaches to childbirth. Qualitative assessments in both cases reveal that respectful care, while not represented in current indicators, is critical for the health of women and newborns. Perinatal outcomes measures thus must be rethought to ensure ethical and safe maternity care. This rethinking will require new questions and new methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wendland, C. (2018, March 1). Who counts? What counts? Place and the limits of perinatal mortality measures. AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.pfor2-1803

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free