Chemical and topographic analysis of eight commercially available dental implants

8Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Surface characterization of dental implants allows us to better understand the effects of the implant on the host biological response. In this study, we analyzed and compared these characteristics among implants commercially available in South Africa. Materials and methods: Eight implants from different manufacturers were chosen for analysis (Touareg, ICE, (R)Evolutions, Uniti, AnyRidge, MIS, Ivory-QSI, Southern), using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), interferometry, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to study the surface chemical composition and morphology. Results: The results indicate that variations in manufacturer processes result in implant surfaces that are distinctly different from one another. Most implants presented a moderately rough surface with sandblasted-only implant surfaces having a lower mean value of Sa when compared with sandblasted and acidetched surfaces. Carbon contamination was detected on all the implants and that of aluminum on five implant surfaces. Ca and P were detected on the surface of Touareg implants, indicating the manufacturer's attempt to enhance osseointegration. Conclusion: The surface of the implants showed a range of chemical, physical properties, and surface topographies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peck, M. T., & Chrcanovic, B. R. (2016). Chemical and topographic analysis of eight commercially available dental implants. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 17(5), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1855

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free