Normative Tensions: European Sanction vs. ASEAN’s Non-Interference in the Case of Myanmar

  • Robertua V
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article attempted to explain the relevancy of European sanction policy and ASEAN’s constructive engagement on Myanmar. In many case, normative power Europe theory which is pioneered by Ian Manners, has been an effective tool to explain the EU’s sanction policy. In this article, it will emphasize Thomas Diez’s postulation of the reflexivity of the EU’s identity as the main aspect of NPE. Consequently, it will elaborate on how EU’s identity is constructed against ASEAN who adopted constructive engagement. However, recent change in Myanmar has provoked the EU to postpone their sanction. It is puzzling because many reports from International Non-Government Organizations show that the reform in Myanmar is weak and unsustainable. ASEAN emerged as important partner for Myanmar in driving democratization and human rights regime construction in Myanmar.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robertua, V. (2014). Normative Tensions: European Sanction vs. ASEAN’s Non-Interference in the Case of Myanmar. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 3(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.2014.0059.167-180

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free