Use of the bougie in simulated difficult intubation. 2. Comparison of single-use bougie with multiple-use bougie

53Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We studied the success rates for tracheal intubation in 32 healthy, anaesthetised patients during simulated grade IIIa laryngoscopy, randomised to either the multiple-use or the single-use bougie. Success rates (primary end-point) and times taken (secondary end-point) to achieve tracheal intubation were recorded. The multiple-use bougie was more successful than the single-use one (15/16 successful intubations vs. 9/16; p = 0.03). With either device, median [range] total tracheal intubation times for successful attempts were < 54 [24-84] s and there were no clinically important differences between these times. We conclude that the multiple-use bougie is a more reliable aid to tracheal intubation than the single-use introducer in grade IIIa laryngoscopy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marfin, A. G., Pandit, J. J., Hames, K. C., Popat, M. T., & Yentis, S. M. (2003). Use of the bougie in simulated difficult intubation. 2. Comparison of single-use bougie with multiple-use bougie. Anaesthesia, 58(9), 852–855. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03289.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free