Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha

155Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two distinct ideas about how morphological case is assigned exist in the recent generative literature: the standard Chomskyan view that case is assigned by designated functional heads to the closest NP via an agreement relationship, and an alternative view in which case is assigned to one NP if there is a second NP in the same local domain (Marantz 1991). We claim that these two ways of assigning case are complementary, based on data from the Turkic language Sakha. Accusative case and dative case in this language are assigned by Marantz-style configurational rules that do not refer directly to functional categories. This is shown by evidence from passives, agentive nominalizations, subject raising, possessor raising, and case assignment in PPs. In contrast, there is evidence that nominative and genitive are assigned by functional heads in the Chomskyan way, as shown by the distribution of nominative case and the relationship between case marking and agreement. The two methods of case assignment thus coexist, not only in Universal Grammar, but even in the grammar of a single language. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baker, M. C., & Vinokurova, N. (2010). Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28(3), 593–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9105-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free