Trisomy 8, a cytogenetic abnormality in myelodysplastic syndromes, is constitutional or not?

18Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Isolated trisomy 8 is not considered presumptive evidence of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in cases without minimal morphological criteria. One reason given is that trisomy 8 (+8) can be found as a constitutional mosaicism (cT8M). We tried to clarify the incidence of cT8M in myeloid neoplasms, specifically in MDS, and the diagnostic value of isolated +8 in MDS. Twenty-two MDS and 10 other myeloid neoplasms carrying +8 were studied. Trisomy 8 was determined in peripheral blood by conventional cytogenetics (CC) and on granulocytes, CD3+ lymphocytes and oral mucosa cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In peripheral blood CC, +8 was seen in 4/32 patients. By FISH, only one patient with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia showed +8 in all cell samples and was interpreted as a cT8M. In our series +8 was acquired in all MDS. Probably, once discarded cT8M by FISH from CD3+ lymphocytes and non-hematological cells, +8 should be considered with enough evidence to MDS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saumell, S., Solé, F., Arenillas, L., Montoro, J., Valcárcel, D., Pedro, C., … Florensa, L. (2015). Trisomy 8, a cytogenetic abnormality in myelodysplastic syndromes, is constitutional or not? PLoS ONE, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129375

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free