Origin and Ubiquity of Short-Period Earth-like Planets: Evidence for the Sequential Accretion Theory of Planet Formation

  • Zhou J
  • Aarseth S
  • Lin D
  • et al.
75Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The formation of gas giant planets is assumed to be preceded by the emergence of solid cores in the conventional sequential-accretion paradigm. This hypothesis implies that the presence of earth-like planets can be inferred from the detection of gas giants. A similar prediction cannot be made with the gravitational instability (hereafter GI) model which assumes that gas giants (hereafter giants) formed from the collapse of gas fragments analogous to their host stars. We propose an observational test for the determination of the dominant planet-formation channel. Based on the sequential-accretion (hereafter SA) model, we identify several potential avenues which may lead to the prolific formation of a population of close-in earth-mass ($M_\oplus$) planets (hereafter close-in earths) around stars with 1) short-period or 2) solitary eccentric giants and 3) systems which contain intermediate-period resonant giants. In contrast, these close-in earths are not expected to form in systems where giants originated rapidly through GI. As a specific example, we suggest that the SA processes led to the formation of the 7.5 $M_\oplus$ planet around GJ 876 and predict that it may have an atmosphere and envelope rich in O$_2$ and liquid water. Assessments of the ubiquity of these planets will lead to 1) the detection of the first habitable terrestrial planets, 2) the verification of the dominant mode of planet formation, 3) an estimate of the fraction of earth-harboring stars, and 4) modification of bio-marker signatures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, J.-L., Aarseth, S. J., Lin, D. N. C., & Nagasawa, M. (2005). Origin and Ubiquity of Short-Period Earth-like Planets: Evidence for the Sequential Accretion Theory of Planet Formation. The Astrophysical Journal, 631(1), L85–L88. https://doi.org/10.1086/497094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free