Skip to main content

Impact of IPM extension for smallholder farmers in the tropics

24Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years, IPM extension came to mean FFS (farmer field school). Most studies of FFS pilot projects suggest that IPM helps farmers to lower costs or to increase yields, although the farmers pass on little of their new knowledge to their neighbours, which limits the cost-effectiveness of FFS. Some quantitative studies of FFS suggest that there is actually little overall impact of FFS programs. FFS may be better suited to stimulating collaborative research with farmers than for extension itself. In other words, FFS may help to perfect the extension message (the technology) which can then be communicated with other methods. There are many alternative extension methods available, although their impact needs further study. The challenge is to find methods that deliver quality and quantity messages (reaching a large audience with an appropriate, understandable message).

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bentley, J. W. (2009). Impact of IPM extension for smallholder farmers in the tropics. In Integrated Pest Management (Vol. 2, pp. 333–346). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8990-9_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free