Optical coherence tomography versus other biomarkers: Associations with physical and cognitive disability in multiple sclerosis

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a biomarker of neuroaxonal loss in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: The objective was to assess the relative role of OCT, next to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and serum markers of disability in MS. Methods: A total of 100 patients and 52 controls underwent OCT to determine peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layers (GCIPL). Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), total lesion volume (TLV), and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) were also assessed. The associations of OCT with disability were examined in linear regression models with correction for age, vision, and education. Results: In patients, pRNFL was associated with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT; p = 0.030). In the multivariate analysis including sNfL and MRI measures, pRNFL (β = 0.19, p = 0.044) and TLV (β = −0.24, p = 0.023) were the only markers associated with the SDMT. pRNFL (p < 0.001) and GCIPL (p < 0.001) showed associations with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). In the multivariate analysis, GCIPL showed the strongest association with the EDSS (β = −0.32, p < 0.001) followed by sNfL (β = 0.18, p = 0.024). Conclusion: The associations of OCT measures with cognitive and physical disability were independent of serum and brain MRI markers of neuroaxonal loss. OCT can be an important tool for stratification in MS, while longitudinal studies using combinations of biomarkers are warranted.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cerdá-Fuertes, N., Stoessel, M., Mickeliunas, G., Pless, S., Cagol, A., Barakovic, M., … Papadopoulou, A. (2023). Optical coherence tomography versus other biomarkers: Associations with physical and cognitive disability in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 29(13), 1540–1550. https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585231198760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free