Tonic immobility in chickens: Is a stimulus that signals shock more aversive than the receipt of shock?

15Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted on the effect of shock and aversive conditioning on tonic immobility. In the first study, increasing the intensity of preinduction shock was shown to produce reliable increases in the duration of immobility. Using classical conditioning procedures in the second experiment, a significant effect of UCS intensity was obtained. In the third experiment, brief confrontation with a conditioned fear stimulus was found more effective than shock for enhancing immobility duration. The data were discussed in terms of the fear hypothesis of animal hypnosis and as supporting a more general notion that the anticipation of shock may be more aversive than the receipt of shock. © 1973 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gallup, G. G. (1973). Tonic immobility in chickens: Is a stimulus that signals shock more aversive than the receipt of shock? Animal Learning & Behavior, 1(3), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199080

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free