Evaluation of indirect and direct scoring methods to relate biochemical soil quality indicators to ecosystem services

4Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Soil health assessments use scoring curves to quantify relationships between soil quality indicators (SQIs) and ecosystem services (ESSs). We evaluated methods for scoring curve development using three labile C pools (β-glucosidase [BG], fluorescein diacetate [FDA] hydrolysis, and permanganate oxidizable carbon [POXC]). Concepts and methods for SQI interpretation used by established frameworks were assessed, with 129 studies reporting relationships to either soil organic C (SOC) (n = 367), a common surrogate for indirect estimation of ESSs, or direct measures of crop yield (n = 88), soil respiration (n = 66), and N2O and CH4 emissions (n = 51). Indirect assessment of BG using SOC and site covariates resolved tillage-based differences (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xia, Y., & Wander, M. (2022). Evaluation of indirect and direct scoring methods to relate biochemical soil quality indicators to ecosystem services. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 86(3), 678–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free