A cytomorphological and immunohistochemical profile of aggressive B-cell lymphoma: High clinical impact of a cumulative immunohistochemical outcome predictor score

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We analyzed morphological and immunohisto-chemical features in 174 aggressive B-cell lymphomas of nodal and extranodal origin. Morphological features included presence or absence of a follicular component and cytologic criteria according to the Kiel classification, whereas immuno-histochemical studies included expression of CD10, BCL-2, BCL-6, IRF4/MUM1, HLA-DR, p53, Ki-67 and the assess-ment of plasmacytoid differentiation. Patients were treated with a CHOP-like regimen. While the presence or absence of either CD10, BCL-6 and IRF4/MUM1 reactivity or plasma-cytoid differentiation did not identify particular cytomorpho-logic or site-specific subtypes, we found that expression of CD10 and BCL-6, and a low reactivity for IRF4/MUM1 were favourable prognostic indicators. In contrast, BCL-2 expres-sion and presence of a monotypic cytoplasmic immunoglob-ulin expression was associated with an unfavourable prognosis in univariate analyses. Meta-analysis of these data resulted in the development of a cumulative immunohisto-chemical outcome predictor score (CIOPS) enabling the recognition of four distinct prognostic groups. Multivariate analysis proved this score to be independent of the interna-tional prognostic index. Such a cumulative immunohisto-chemical scoring approach might provide a valuable alternative in the recognition of defined risk types of aggressive B-cell lymphomas. © Springer-Verlag 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Höller, S., Horn, H., Lohr, A., Mäder, U., Katzenberger, T., Kalla, J., … Ott, G. (2009). A cytomorphological and immunohistochemical profile of aggressive B-cell lymphoma: High clinical impact of a cumulative immunohistochemical outcome predictor score. Journal of Hematopathology, 2(4), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-009-0044-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free