Comparison of monoclonal and polyclonal antibody for confirmation of cytomegalovirus isolates by fluorescent staining

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled monoclonal cytomegalovirus antibody reagent incorporating Evans blue (Syva/Genetic Systems, Palo Alto, Calif.) was compared to a fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled polyclonal antibody (Dynatech Diagnostics, Inc., South Windham. Maine) for identification of cytomegalovirus in tissue culture. A total of 191 cultures, 86 positive and 105 negative for cytomegalovirus by cytopathic effect in WI38 cells, were stained in parallel and examined by fluorescent microscopy. No false-negative results were noted with either regent; however, the polyclonal antibody-stained slides required the use of a separate counterstain to decrease nonspecific fluorescence. The polyclonal reagent gave a false-positive reaction with one varicella-zoster virus isolate and four simian cytomegalovirus isolates. No false-positive results were noted with the monoclonal reagent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fiacco, V., Bryson, Y. J., & Bruckner, D. A. (1984). Comparison of monoclonal and polyclonal antibody for confirmation of cytomegalovirus isolates by fluorescent staining. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 19(6), 928–930. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.19.6.928-930.1984

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free