Recent evidence indicates that partisans discriminate against those from the opposing party. However, it is still unclear whether partisan out-group prejudice reveals a desire for out-group harm or in-group help. We investigate the conditions under which these tendencies arise. Using one observational survey and three survey experiments, we show that when given the chance to either harm the out-group or help the in-group, people tend to choose the latter. Yet while the tendency to help the in-group appears to be primary, we also show that under situations of symbolic threat to partisan identity, respondents shift gears and opt for harming the out-group as a strategy to defend the status of their political group identity. These results add to our understanding of how partisan identity and polarization works in non-elites.
CITATION STYLE
Amira, K., Wright, J. C., & Goya-Tocchetto, D. (2021). In-Group Love Versus Out-Group Hate: Which Is More Important to Partisans and When? Political Behavior, 43(2), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09557-6
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.