Paradoxical gaps in resilient environmental governance

3Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Over the last few decades, resilience and its related practices have been at the core of responding challenges in the Global South and North. We should, however, be conscious of its gaps for many reasons. First, environmental plans not attuned to local traditions can create cultural conflicts. Second, the politicised nature of international agreements poses unintended consequences as societies find it hard to engage in such agreements. Third, uncertainties about changes in socio-ecological systems reduce people’s adaptive capacity. Without an awareness of these inconsistencies, policymakers risk impeding societies’ adaptation to environmental change. By doing a systematic review of articles from academic and policy publications, this paper explores repercussions for environmental governance, illuminating key concerns in protected areas, climate change policy, and hydropower systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nebasifu, A. A., & Atong, N. M. (2020). Paradoxical gaps in resilient environmental governance. Environmental Reviews, 28(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2019-0028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free