Three alternative approaches, namely the extended/generalized finite element method (XFEM/GFEM), the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) and phase field methods, are surveyed and compared in the context of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). The purpose of the study is to provide a critical literature review, emphasizing on the mathematical, conceptual and implementation particularities that lead to the specific advantages and disadvantages of each method, as well as to offer numerical examples that help illustrate these features.
CITATION STYLE
Egger, A., Pillai, U., Agathos, K., Kakouris, E., Chatzi, E., Aschroft, I. A., & Triantafyllou, S. P. (2019). Discrete and phase field methods for linear elastic fracture mechanics: A comparative study and state-of-the-art review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122436
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.