Discrete and phase field methods for linear elastic fracture mechanics: A comparative study and state-of-the-art review

56Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Three alternative approaches, namely the extended/generalized finite element method (XFEM/GFEM), the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) and phase field methods, are surveyed and compared in the context of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). The purpose of the study is to provide a critical literature review, emphasizing on the mathematical, conceptual and implementation particularities that lead to the specific advantages and disadvantages of each method, as well as to offer numerical examples that help illustrate these features.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Egger, A., Pillai, U., Agathos, K., Kakouris, E., Chatzi, E., Aschroft, I. A., & Triantafyllou, S. P. (2019). Discrete and phase field methods for linear elastic fracture mechanics: A comparative study and state-of-the-art review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122436

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free