What do climate change winners owe, and to whom?

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Climate ethics have been concerned with polluter pays, beneficiary pays and ability to pay principles, all of which consider climate change as a single negative externality. This paper considers it as a constellation of externalities, positive and negative, with different associated demands of justice. This is important because explicitly considering positive externalities has not to our knowledge been done in the climate ethics literature. Specifically, it is argued that those who enjoy passive gains from climate change owe gains not to the net losers, but to the emitters, just as the emitters owe compensation to the net losers for the negative externality. This is defended by appeal to theoretical virtues and to the social benefits of generating positive externalities, even when those positive externalities are coupled with far greater negative externalities. We call this the Polluter Pays, Then Receives ('PPTR', or 'Peter') Principle.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mintz-Woo, K., & Leroux, J. (2021, November 23). What do climate change winners owe, and to whom? Economics and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267120000449

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free