Founding transdisciplinary knowledge production in critical realism: implications and benefits

10Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article explains the implications and benefits of founding transdisciplinary collaborations of knowledge production in critical realism. We call such equal partnerships of researchers and practitioners knowledge alliances. Drawing on the distinction between the referent to which we refer (the object that our research is about) and our references (our research about this object), we show that practitioners can contribute to the process of knowledge production by providing access to referents and producing references but also by achieving societal relevance. In order to accomplish excellence, knowledge production should be organized in ways that engage different types of knowledge in a constructive interplay and use the respective strong points of researchers and practitioners. Abduction and retroduction, two modes of inference vital to critical realism, are particularly inclined to benefit from involving practitioners in knowledge production. We call such an approach potential-oriented and put it in contrast to problem-orientation and the empiricism of evidence-based research and policy-making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stigendal, M., & Novy, A. (2018). Founding transdisciplinary knowledge production in critical realism: implications and benefits. Journal of Critical Realism, 17(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2018.1514561

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free