A double-blind, randomised, controlled Phase II trial of Heliox28 gas mixture in lung cancer patients with dyspnoea on exertion

59Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Helium has a low density and the potential of reducing the work of breathing and improving alveolar ventilation when replacing nitrogen in air. A Phase II, double-blind, randomised, prospective, controlled trial was undertaken to assess whether Heliox28 (72% He/28% O2) compared with oxygen-enriched air (72% N2/28% O2) or medical air (78.9% N2/21.1% O2) could reduce dyspnoea and improve the exercise capability of patients with primary lung cancer and dyspnoea on exertion (Borg > 3). A total of 12 patients (seven male, five female patients, age 53-78) breathed the test gases in randomised order via a facemask and inspiratory demand valve at rest and while performing 6-min walk tests. Pulse oximetry (SaO2) was recorded continuously. Respiratory rate and dyspnoea ratings (Borg and VAS) were taken before and immediately post-walk. Breathing Heliox28 at rest significantly increased SaO2 compared to oxygen-enriched air (96 ± 2 cf 94 ± 2, P < 0.01). When compared to medical air, breathing Heliox28 but not oxygen-enriched air gave a significant improvement in the exercise capability (P < 0.0001), SaO 2 (P < 0.05) and dyspnoea scores (VAS, P < 0.05) of lung cancer patients. © 2004 Cancer Research UK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmedzai, S. H., Laude, E., Robertson, A., Troy, G., & Vora, V. (2004). A double-blind, randomised, controlled Phase II trial of Heliox28 gas mixture in lung cancer patients with dyspnoea on exertion. British Journal of Cancer, 90(2), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601527

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free