Helium has a low density and the potential of reducing the work of breathing and improving alveolar ventilation when replacing nitrogen in air. A Phase II, double-blind, randomised, prospective, controlled trial was undertaken to assess whether Heliox28 (72% He/28% O2) compared with oxygen-enriched air (72% N2/28% O2) or medical air (78.9% N2/21.1% O2) could reduce dyspnoea and improve the exercise capability of patients with primary lung cancer and dyspnoea on exertion (Borg > 3). A total of 12 patients (seven male, five female patients, age 53-78) breathed the test gases in randomised order via a facemask and inspiratory demand valve at rest and while performing 6-min walk tests. Pulse oximetry (SaO2) was recorded continuously. Respiratory rate and dyspnoea ratings (Borg and VAS) were taken before and immediately post-walk. Breathing Heliox28 at rest significantly increased SaO2 compared to oxygen-enriched air (96 ± 2 cf 94 ± 2, P < 0.01). When compared to medical air, breathing Heliox28 but not oxygen-enriched air gave a significant improvement in the exercise capability (P < 0.0001), SaO 2 (P < 0.05) and dyspnoea scores (VAS, P < 0.05) of lung cancer patients. © 2004 Cancer Research UK.
CITATION STYLE
Ahmedzai, S. H., Laude, E., Robertson, A., Troy, G., & Vora, V. (2004). A double-blind, randomised, controlled Phase II trial of Heliox28 gas mixture in lung cancer patients with dyspnoea on exertion. British Journal of Cancer, 90(2), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601527
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.