The Warmth of Medicine: The Irreplaceability of Doctors in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article argues that despite the remarkable advances of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine -including demonstrated capabilities in image recognition, diagnosis, treatment planning, and even empathic communication in controlled settings-the core of medical practice remains irreducibly human. We identify three domains in which AI cannot replace doctors: the holistic, sensory art of clinical observation and intuition; the longitudinal, trust-based doctor-patient relationship built on genuine emotional connection; and the capacity to embrace clinical uncertainty, exercise moral responsibility, and make courageous decisions in the absence of algorithmic guidance. The intended audience includes clinical doctors, medical students, medical educators, and health policy makers navigating the integration of AI into practice. We conclude that preserving “AI-free clinical time” in medical training and safeguarding the humanistic dimensions of care are essential, and technology is to complement rather than diminish the healing arts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, Y. Y., & Liu, J. M. (2026). The Warmth of Medicine: The Irreplaceability of Doctors in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Medical Internet Research. JMIR Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.2196/97412

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free