Zona pellucida damage to human embryos after cryopreservation and the consequences for their blastomere survival and in-vitro viability

46Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The study objective was to quantify zona pellucida (ZP) damage in cryopreserved human embryos. The influence of two different freezing containers was investigated, and the influence of freezing damage on the survival and viability of the embryos evaluated. ZP damage did not differ according to whether embryos originated from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles or from IVF cycles in association with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The freezing container, however, significantly influenced the occurrence of ZP damage after cryopreservation. More damage was observed when the embryos were frozen-thawed using plastic cryovials than using plastic mini-straws (16.6% versus 2.3%; P < 0.0001). A clear association was found between blastomere survival and ZP intactness. Consequently, the percentage of embryos with 100% blastomere survival was higher when embryos were frozen-thawed using plastic mini-straws. The further cleavage of frozen-thawed embryos suitable for transfer was not different whether there was ZP damage or not; however, it was higher when there was 100% blastomere survival as compared with when some blastomeres were damaged (79.0% versus 43.7%; P < 0.0001). Consequently, more embryos suitable for transfer cleaved further when they were frozen-thawed using plastic mini-straws. In conclusion, the aim of a cryopreservation programme should be to have as many fully intact embryos as possible after thawing. Increased ZP damage might indicate a suboptimal cryopreservation procedure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Den Abbeel, E., & Van Steirteghem, A. (2000). Zona pellucida damage to human embryos after cryopreservation and the consequences for their blastomere survival and in-vitro viability. Human Reproduction, 15(2), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.2.373

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free