Conservative management of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Results of a large retrospective series

129Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To assess the long-term oncological outcome and the fertility of young women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (ES/EOC) treated with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). Patients and methods: All patients treated with FSS for ES/EOC in two Italian centers were considered for this analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to test demographic characteristics and clinical features for the association with overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and fertility. Results: From 1982 to 2010, 240 patients with malignant ES/EOC were treated with FSS in two tertiary centers in Italy. At a median follow-up of 9 years, 27 patients had relapsed (11%) and 11 (5%) had died of progressive disease. Multivariate analysis found only grade 3 negatively affected the prognosis of patients [hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence: 4.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-11.7, P = 0.0067; HR for death: 7.6, 95% CI: 2.0-29.3, P = 0.0032]. Grade 3 was also significantly associated with extra-ovarian relapse (P = 0.006). Of the 105 patients (45%) who tried to become pregnant, 84 (80%) were successful. Conclusions: Conservative treatment can be proposed to all young patients when tumor is limited to the ovaries, as ovarian recurrences can always be managed successfully. Patients with G3 tumors are more likely to have distant recurrences and should be closely monitored. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fruscio, R., Corso, S., Ceppi, L., Garavaglia, D., Garbi, A., Floriani, I., … Colombo, N. (2013). Conservative management of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Results of a large retrospective series. Annals of Oncology, 24(1), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds241

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free