Developmental robotics, optimal artificial curiosity, creativity, music, and the fine arts

201Citations
Citations of this article
256Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Even in the absence of external reward, babies and scientists and others explore their world. Using some sort of adaptive predictive world model, they improve their ability to answer questions such as what happens if I do this or that? They lose interest in both the predictable things and those predicted to remain unpredictable despite some effort. One can design curious robots that do the same. The authors basic idea (1990, 1991) for doing so is a reinforcement learning (RL) controller is rewarded for action sequences that improve the predictor. Here, this idea is revisited in the context of recent results on optimal predictors and optimal RL machines. Several new variants of the basic principle are proposed. Finally, it is pointed out how the fine arts can be formally understood as a consequence of the principle: given some subjective observer, great works of art and music yield observation histories exhibiting more novel, previously unknown compressibility/regularity/predictability (with respect to the observers particular learning algorithm) than lesser works, thus deepening the observers understanding of the world and what is possible in it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schmidhuber, J. (2006, June 1). Developmental robotics, optimal artificial curiosity, creativity, music, and the fine arts. Connection Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540090600768658

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free