Daily-diary evaluated side-effects of conformal versus conventional prostatic cancer radiotherapy technique

15Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Conventional 4-field box radiotherapy technique induces high morbidity for patients with localized prostatic cancer. Using a patient daily diary, the present study compared side-effects after conventional radiotherapy with conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Fifty-eight patients treated with the conventional technique (with or without sucralfate) were compared with 72 patients treated with conformal technique. The patient groups were compared with an age-matched control population. Patients treated with conformal technique were also evaluated regarding acute and late urinary problems. Results showed that patients treated with conformal technique reported significantly fewer side-effects as compared with conventional technique. Patients treated with sucralfate also showed slightly decreased intestinal morbidity in comparison to non-sucralfate group. Acute and late morbidity evaluated by the patients was decreased after conformal radiotherapy as compared with the conventional technique. Sucralfate may be of value if conformal radiotherapy is used for dose escalation in prostatic cancer patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Widmark, A., Fransson, P., Franzén, L., Littbrand, B., & Henriksson, R. (1997). Daily-diary evaluated side-effects of conformal versus conventional prostatic cancer radiotherapy technique. Acta Oncologica, 36(5), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841869709001306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free