Single-dose, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy cross-over comparison of extradural and I.V. Clonidine in chronic pain

29Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We studied 10 patients with chronic back pain who had claimed benefit with a previous extradural dose of clonidine 150 μg combined with local anaesthetic. We compared a single dose of clonidine 150 μg given by either the extradural or i.v. route in a double-blind, randomized, double-dummy and cross-over fashion, with 80% power to detect a difference in the analgesic effect of the two routes. Pain intensity, pain relief, adverse effects, mood, sedation and vital signs were assessed by a nurse observer. l.v. clonidine produced significantly (P < 0.04) greater analgesia than extradural clonidine in one of the five analgesic outcome measures. Clonidine given by either route produced statistically significant sedation and significant decreases in arterial pressure and heart rate. In this study, extradural clonidine had no significant clinical advantages compared with i.v. clonidine; clonidine 150 μg by either route produced a high incidence of adverse effects. (Br. J. Anaesth. 1993; 71: 665-669) © 1993 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carroll, D., Jadad, A., King, V., Wiffen, P., Glynn, C., & Mcquay, H. (1993). Single-dose, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy cross-over comparison of extradural and I.V. Clonidine in chronic pain. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 71(5), 665–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/71.5.665

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free