Optimal timing of operation for bleeding peptic ulcer: Prospective randomised trial

107Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

From October 1980 to September 1983 all patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were admitted to a centralised unit and investigated by early endoscopy. A total of 142 patients with a proved duodenal or gastric ulcer were randomised after stratification for age and site of ulcer to early (aggressive) surgical management or a delayed (conservative) policy. Significantly more operations (n = 42; 60%) were performed in the early than in the delayed (n = 9; 20%) groups (p < 0.01). There were no deaths among the 42 patients under 60. The overall mortality in the 100 patients aged over 60 was 10% and when analysed on an 'intention to treat' basis there was no difference between early and delayed surgery. When, however, an unrelated death from a bleeding colonic polyp was excluded and the data analysed on 'treatment received' the mortality was only 2% in the early group compared with 13% in the delayed group (p < 0.05). When analysis was confined to gastric ulcer the difference between early (0%) and delayed (24%) treatment was even greater. The results of this trial indicate that for patients over 60 an aggressive surgical policy is associated with a significant reduction in mortality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morris, D. L., Hawker, P. C., Brearley, S., Simms, M., Dykes, P. W., & Keighley, M. R. (1984). Optimal timing of operation for bleeding peptic ulcer: Prospective randomised trial. British Medical Journal, 288(6426), 1277–1280. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.288.6426.1277

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free