Does It Make a Difference? L2 Vocabulary Learning via Mobile and Conventional Mode

  • Zarei G
  • Jalilifar A
  • Khazaie S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study investigated the significance of mobile learning (m-learning) of English vocabulary items through a traditional contrasted with a blended method of content representation. To achieve the goals, sixty semi-illiterate adults were evaluated for their knowledge of the English alphabet and then randomly placed in two groups: traditional (G1) and the blended group (G2). Next, they were presented thirty new English vocabulary items through the two methods. Also, the vocabulary items were taught with and without pictorial annotations. Upon the completion of teaching, the participants took the paper-and-pencil-based English Vocabulary Recognition and Recall (EVRR) test. The test results were subjected to the appropriate statistical analyses. The analysis demonstrated the supremacy of blended group's performance over the traditional group in vocabulary learning. Furthermore, the obtained results confirmed that pictorial annotations enhanced the learning of L2 vocabulary compared with non-annotated items. The results can provide some practical and theoretical implications for both teachers and learners.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zarei, G. R., Jalilifar, A., & Khazaie, S. (2013). Does It Make a Difference? L2 Vocabulary Learning via Mobile and Conventional Mode. Studies in English Language Teaching, 1(1), 200. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v1n1p200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free