Dry and moist convective upper bounds for near-surface temperatures

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The current pace of climate change challenges the statistical methods used for bounding heatwave intensities, prompting the need for a physics-based upper bound to extreme surface temperatures (Ts). A recently proposed approach for deriving such a bound uses the hypothesis that convective instability limits the development of heat extremes. Here, we show that under this hypothesis, the absolute upper bound for extreme Ts - obtained in the limit of zero surface humidity - is set by dry convection. This bound is reached when the mid-troposphere and the surface are connected by a dry adiabat. Previous work suggested that this upper bound is instead set by moist convective instability and exceeds the dry convective limit. We resolve this discrepancy by showing that moist convection only limits heatwave development in the presence of enough surface specific humidity, and that the moist convective upper bound cannot exceed the dry limit. Yet, numerous temperature profiles in observational and reanalysis records do exceed the dry convective limit. We show that these occur exclusively in regions where the boundary layer top reaches deep into the mid-troposphere, and that a near-surface superadiabatic layer (an expected feature of convective boundary layers) controls the amount by which the limit is exceeded. Our work suggests that deriving physical limits on boundary layer depth and superadiabatic layer strength, two quantities largely influenced by land surface properties, may better help constrain the intensity of future dry heatwaves. We conclude with an overview of the different upper bounds applicable in dry and moist scenarios, including the roles of processes such as entrainment and convective inhibition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicolas, Q., & Hotz, B. (2026). Dry and moist convective upper bounds for near-surface temperatures. Weather and Climate Dynamics, 7(2), 843–856. https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-843-2026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free