Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Total System Effectiveness (TSE) framework to assist national policy-makers in prioritizing vaccines. The pilot was launched in Thailand to explore the potential use of TSE in a country with established governance structures and accountable decision-making processes for immunization policy. While the existing literature informs vaccine adoption decisions in GAVI-eligible countries, this study attempts to address a gap in the literature by examining the policy process of a non-GAVI eligible country. Methods: A rotavirus vaccine (RVV) test case was used to compare the decision criteria made by the existing processes (Expanded Program on Immunization [EPI], and National List of Essential Medicines [NLEM]) for vaccine prioritization and the TSE-pilot model, using Thailand specific data. Results: The existing decision-making processes in Thailand and TSE were found to offer similar recommendations on the selection of a RVV product. Conclusion: The authors believe that TSE can provide a well-reasoned and step by step approach for countries, especially low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), to develop a systematic and transparent decision-making process for immunization policy.
CITATION STYLE
Rattanavipapong, W., Kapoor, R., Teerawattananon, Y., Luttjeboer, J., Botwright, S., Archer, R. A., … Hutubessy, R. C. W. (2020). Comparing 3 approaches for making vaccine adoption decisions in Thailand. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 9(10), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.