Comparing 3 approaches for making vaccine adoption decisions in Thailand

7Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Total System Effectiveness (TSE) framework to assist national policy-makers in prioritizing vaccines. The pilot was launched in Thailand to explore the potential use of TSE in a country with established governance structures and accountable decision-making processes for immunization policy. While the existing literature informs vaccine adoption decisions in GAVI-eligible countries, this study attempts to address a gap in the literature by examining the policy process of a non-GAVI eligible country. Methods: A rotavirus vaccine (RVV) test case was used to compare the decision criteria made by the existing processes (Expanded Program on Immunization [EPI], and National List of Essential Medicines [NLEM]) for vaccine prioritization and the TSE-pilot model, using Thailand specific data. Results: The existing decision-making processes in Thailand and TSE were found to offer similar recommendations on the selection of a RVV product. Conclusion: The authors believe that TSE can provide a well-reasoned and step by step approach for countries, especially low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), to develop a systematic and transparent decision-making process for immunization policy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rattanavipapong, W., Kapoor, R., Teerawattananon, Y., Luttjeboer, J., Botwright, S., Archer, R. A., … Hutubessy, R. C. W. (2020). Comparing 3 approaches for making vaccine adoption decisions in Thailand. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 9(10), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2020.01

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free