Intuitionistic open induction and least number principle and the buss operator

6Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In “Intuitionistic validity in T-normal Kripke structures,” Buss asked whether every intuitionistic theory is, for some classical theory T, that of all T-normal Kripke structures H (T) for which he gave an r.e. axiomatization. In the language of arithmetic Iop and Lop denote PA− plus Open Induction or Open LNP, iop and lop are their intuitionistic deductive closures. We show H (Iop) = lop is recursively axiomatizable and lop ⊢i c⊣ iop, while i∀1 ⊬ lop. If iT proves PEMatomic but not totality of a classically provably total Diophantine function of T, then H (T) ⊈ iT and so iT ∉ range(H). A result due to Wehmeier then implies iᴨ1 ∉ range(H).We prove Iop is not∀2-conservative over i∀1. If Iop ⊆ T ⊆ I∀1, then iT is not closed under MRopen or Friedman’s translation, so iT ∉ range (H). Both Iop and I∀1 are closed under the negative translation. © 1998 by the University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ardeshir, M., & Moniri, M. (1998). Intuitionistic open induction and least number principle and the buss operator. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 39(2), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1039293063

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free