Remaking the Sustainable Development Goals: relational Indigenous epistemologies

8Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were inclusive in their design, the reliance on official measurement infrastructures has upheld narrow definitions of both the terms of sustainability and development. Indigenous and non-Indigenous "governance beyond the state"approaches call these definitions into question. They highlight that disaggregated official data are unable to fully reflect alternative grounds and aspirations of living sustainably with the environment and non-human world. Relational Indigenous epistemologies and practices contribute to alternative epistemic infrastructures. In this paper, three examples from the Andean-Pacific region provide an alternative lens through which to reconceptualize and remake the SDG landscape. Together this suite of cases highlights the importance of bottom-up articulation processes, knowledge inclusion, and alternative epistemic harmonization for operationalizing the SDGs. In particular, we highlight the urgent need to renegotiate the relationship between Indigenous communities and the global measurement infrastructure in order to pursue and realize global sustainability goals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Waldmüller, J. M., Yap, M., & Watene, K. (2022). Remaking the Sustainable Development Goals: relational Indigenous epistemologies. Policy and Society, 41(4), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free